Search for: "US v. Hyde" Results 1 - 20 of 339
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2008, 8:05 am
" "Educational fair rights use has been eroded," concluded Hyde. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 3:58 pm by Patricia Salkin
Plaintiff Richard Specht challenged a land use variance and the vacation of a cul-de-sac in Big Water, which the Town’s Board of Adjustment and Town Council granted in favor of Specht’s neighbors, Paul Hyde and Debbie Hyde. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 12:12 pm by P.J. Blount
She uses the case Dow Chemical Co. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Using original archival research, this Article show that the amendment has had a far greater impact.In popular debate, proponents of the Hyde Amendment helped to forge an idea of complicity-based conscience that has recently transformed fights about everything from same-sex marriage to contraceptive access. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 4:45 pm
The bill would also protect the right to abortion in Illinois — even if the unthinkable happens and Roe v. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 10:15 am
”It seems that Speirs hit the gutter with that one.For a copy of the Appellate Division’s decision, please use this link: Speirs v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 3:01 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Starting in 1977, the Hyde Amendment banned the use of any federal funds for abortion, allowing only exceptions for pregnancies that endanger the life of the woman, or that result from rape or incest. [read post]
18 Oct 2015, 3:52 pm by Patricia Salkin
Saint James Antiochian Orthodox Church v Town of Hyde Park, 2015 WL 5827160 (NYAD 2 Dept. 10/7/2015)Filed under: Current Caselaw - New York, Site Plan Review [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 4:30 am by Barry Sookman
Hyde, 2015 ONSC 1053 http://t.co/n4pGQVloxo -> Anton Piller order issued in trade secret case, TSI International Group Inc. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 3:46 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The People moved in limine to preclude the introduction of evidence at trial by the defendant seeking to establish that the defendant's use of the property was a pre-existing, non-conforming use, saying that the defendant had failed to timely appeal this issue to the Town of Hyde Park Zoning Board of Appeals. [read post]